Skip to main content

Featured Story

Floki Inu Restricts Access to Staking Programs in Hong Kong: Regulatory Concerns Addressed

In a recent development, Floki Inu has made the decision to block users in Hong Kong from accessing its staking programs. This action follows a warning from the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong, which raised concerns about the staking programs being labeled as suspicious investment products due to the high annualized return targets ranging from 30% to over 100%. Despite the regulatory scrutiny, the Floki team has come forward to defend the elevated Annual Percentage Yield (APY) by explaining that it is a result of allocating the majority of TokenFi's token supply to stakers. Key Points: Floki Inu has restricted access to its staking programs for users in Hong Kong. The Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong issued a cautionary warning regarding the staking programs' high annualized return targets. The Floki team justified the high APY by attributing it to the allocation of the majority of TokenFi's token supply to stakers.

Coinbase's Final Stand: Challenging the SEC Lawsuit on Cryptocurrency Regulation

a legal brief submitted to Judge Katherine Polk Failla of the Southern District of New York, cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase has made its final arguments against the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) lawsuit. Coinbase contends that tokens traded on the platform are not securities and that the SEC has overstepped its regulatory boundaries. The exchange is seeking to have the lawsuit dismissed before it goes to trial.

Coinbase's Argument

Coinbase's argument rests on two main points:

  1. Tokens are not securities: According to Coinbase, the tokens traded on its platform do not meet the criteria for being classified as investment contracts, which are considered securities. The exchange maintains that these tokens have utility and are used for specific purposes within their respective networks.

  2. The SEC's regulatory authority: Coinbase also asserts that the SEC is violating the Major Questions Doctrine, which sets limits on the regulator's authority. The exchange argues that the SEC's lawsuit goes beyond its jurisdiction and interferes with the legitimate operations of the platform.

Challenges Faced by Coinbase

While Coinbase is pushing for a swift dismissal of the lawsuit, insiders suggest that their motion may face challenges. Motions for judgment on the pleadings are typically not easy to win, and it is unlikely that the court will rule in Coinbase's favor without further proceedings.

Potential Trial and Timeframe

If Judge Failla is not convinced by Coinbase's arguments and decides not to dismiss the case, the exchange would like to proceed to trial as quickly as possible. However, the discovery phase alone could take up to a year, potentially pushing a trial date to at least the first quarter of 2025.

Judge Failla's Familiarity with Crypto

Judge Failla has already presided over cases involving cryptocurrency this year. She has issued rulings in favor of DeFi giant Uniswap and Ripple. Her previous experience with crypto-related cases may provide valuable insights into the complexities of the industry and could influence her decision in this lawsuit.

In conclusion, Coinbase has made its final arguments against the SEC's lawsuit, asserting that tokens traded on its platform are not securities and that the SEC has exceeded its regulatory authority. While the outcome of the motion for judgment on the pleadings remains uncertain, Coinbase is prepared to proceed to trial if necessary. The decision of Judge Failla, who has experience with crypto-related cases, will ultimately determine the next steps in this legal battle.

Comments

Trending Stories