Skip to main content

Featured Story

Decrypt Phishing Incident: Lessons Learned and Insights

Understanding the Decrypt Phishing Incident: A Cautionary Tale In the ever-evolving landscape of digital communication, the specter of phishing attacks looms large, demonstrating once again how critical it is to remain vigilant against malicious actors. On March 27, 2024, a phishing scheme masquerading as Decrypt infiltrated the inboxes of our newsletter subscribers, falsely announcing a token airdrop. This incident serves as a stark reminder of the importance of cybersecurity and the need for accurate communication in the wake of such threats. The Incident Explained Phishing Attempt: Early in the morning of March 27, hackers impersonated Decrypt to deceive subscribers with a fictitious token airdrop announcement. Immediate Response: Upon discovering the scam, a follow-up email was dispatched to our readers, alerting them to the phishing attempt. Misplaced Blame: In our urgency to address the situation, we erroneously implicated our email service provider, MailerLite, for t...

Unveiling the Environmental Impact of AI: A Groundbreaking Report by Digiconomist Founder Alex de Vries

In a new report released by Digiconomist founder Alex de Vries, the environmental impact of artificial intelligence (AI) is brought to the forefront. The report focuses on the training and inference phases of AI models, highlighting the often overlooked contribution of the inference phase to the overall lifecycle cost of an AI model. De Vries draws parallels between AI developers' claims of using renewable energy and those made by cryptocurrency companies, pointing out the negative economic and environmental consequences of constructing large data centers for AI models.

The Environmental Impact of AI

The report by Alex de Vries sheds light on an important and often overlooked aspect of AI development - its environmental impact. While much attention has been given to the energy consumption of AI during the training phase, the inference phase is found to be equally significant in terms of its contribution to the overall lifecycle cost of an AI model. This finding challenges the prevailing notion that the environmental impact of AI is limited to the training phase alone.

Parallels with Cryptocurrency Companies

De Vries draws parallels between AI developers' claims of using renewable energy and those made by cryptocurrency companies. In both cases, the construction of large data centers is required to support the computational requirements of the respective technologies. However, the construction of these data centers has negative economic and environmental consequences. The report highlights the need for a more comprehensive approach to assessing the environmental impact of AI, one that takes into account the entire lifecycle of an AI model.

The Need for Sustainable AI Development

The findings of the report underscore the importance of sustainable AI development. As AI continues to proliferate across industries, it is imperative that we address its environmental impact. AI developers must take into account the energy consumption and carbon footprint associated with both the training and inference phases of AI models. This requires a shift towards renewable energy sources and more efficient computing infrastructure.

Conclusion

The report by Alex de Vries serves as a wake-up call for the AI industry and environmental groups alike. It highlights the significant contribution of the inference phase to the overall lifecycle cost of an AI model and draws attention to the negative economic and environmental consequences of constructing large data centers. As AI technologies continue to advance, it is crucial that sustainability remains at the forefront of AI development. Only through a concerted effort to reduce the environmental impact of AI can we ensure a sustainable future for this transformative technology.

Comments

Trending Stories