Skip to main content

Featured Story

Unveiling the MailerLite Phishing Attack: A Deep Dive into the Crypto Market Breach

The recent phishing attack on email service provider MailerLite has raised significant concerns within the crypto market. The company disclosed to Decrypt that the breach, which occurred when a support team member unwittingly fell victim to a deceptive link and provided their Google credentials, resulted in unauthorized access to MailerLite's internal system. Here are the key points of the incident: Hackers gained access to MailerLite's internal system by executing a password reset for a specific user on the admin panel. They were able to impersonate user accounts, focusing primarily on cryptocurrency-related accounts. A total of 117 accounts were accessed, with some being used to launch phishing campaigns using stolen information. Notable affected accounts included CoinTelegraph, Wallet Connect, Token Terminal, DeFi, and Decrypt. The hackers managed to steal over $580,000, according to ZachXBT, with the funds being sent to a specified address. Web3 security firm Blockai

Unveiling the Environmental Impact of AI: A Groundbreaking Report by Digiconomist Founder Alex de Vries

In a new report released by Digiconomist founder Alex de Vries, the environmental impact of artificial intelligence (AI) is brought to the forefront. The report focuses on the training and inference phases of AI models, highlighting the often overlooked contribution of the inference phase to the overall lifecycle cost of an AI model. De Vries draws parallels between AI developers' claims of using renewable energy and those made by cryptocurrency companies, pointing out the negative economic and environmental consequences of constructing large data centers for AI models.

The Environmental Impact of AI

The report by Alex de Vries sheds light on an important and often overlooked aspect of AI development - its environmental impact. While much attention has been given to the energy consumption of AI during the training phase, the inference phase is found to be equally significant in terms of its contribution to the overall lifecycle cost of an AI model. This finding challenges the prevailing notion that the environmental impact of AI is limited to the training phase alone.

Parallels with Cryptocurrency Companies

De Vries draws parallels between AI developers' claims of using renewable energy and those made by cryptocurrency companies. In both cases, the construction of large data centers is required to support the computational requirements of the respective technologies. However, the construction of these data centers has negative economic and environmental consequences. The report highlights the need for a more comprehensive approach to assessing the environmental impact of AI, one that takes into account the entire lifecycle of an AI model.

The Need for Sustainable AI Development

The findings of the report underscore the importance of sustainable AI development. As AI continues to proliferate across industries, it is imperative that we address its environmental impact. AI developers must take into account the energy consumption and carbon footprint associated with both the training and inference phases of AI models. This requires a shift towards renewable energy sources and more efficient computing infrastructure.

Conclusion

The report by Alex de Vries serves as a wake-up call for the AI industry and environmental groups alike. It highlights the significant contribution of the inference phase to the overall lifecycle cost of an AI model and draws attention to the negative economic and environmental consequences of constructing large data centers. As AI technologies continue to advance, it is crucial that sustainability remains at the forefront of AI development. Only through a concerted effort to reduce the environmental impact of AI can we ensure a sustainable future for this transformative technology.

Comments

Trending Stories